Trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC) is now recognized as one of the major contributors to mortality in bad injured patients.
Its pathophysiological pathways is debated and still not well known, but seem to be clear, and widely accepted, that the profibrinolytic state, triggered from many and different factors involved in trauma, leads to an acute Fibrinogen consumption.
Thrombin and Coagulation Factors in fact seems to be preserved and well functioning even in bad traumatized patients.
This lack of Fibrinogen, at least in the early phase of trauma, is the real cause of coagulopathy and has to be early recognized and treated to revert the altered coagulation asset existing in a great part of traumatic patients.

The substitution of massively deteriorated Fibrinogen is the therapy of choice in patients with acute TIC.
Two ways of achieving this goal are recently shown to be feasible, and from different point of view, effective.
The first is the Fibrinogen replacement with PRBC, FFP and PLT with a fixed ratio (1:1:1 or 1:1:2).
The second is a Goal Directed Therapy (GDT) with Fibrinogen concentrate administered on the base of thromboelastography profile of the clot, targeted to guide the Fibrinogen administration and monitoring the profile of clot formation.
The clinical challenge for physicians facing traumatic emergencies, both in prehospital and in-hospital field, is to early recognize the TIC in patients with low injurity score and well preserved physiologic parameters. The early recognition of coagulative system alteration leads to an early support of coagulation and hopefully to a better outcome.
There is no clear evidence and consensus on which hematologic or clinical indicators to use as acute coagulopathy risk stratification in trauma patients.
On Feb 20 and 21 in Bologna, some of major italian experts in trauma gave life to a consensus conference on this topic. The result of the conference leads to an initial, but not least important, consensus on the major implant of the theory at the base of recognition and treatment of TIC.
First step of this implant is the decision on when to treat the patients and when the treatment is futile. If the treatment is not futile the second step is to recognize, based on hematologic values and clinical parameters, the patients at risk of coagulopathy. Some values were identified as suitable for the stratification of the risk, but among the participants were not consensus on which is the most important and wich cut-off level to use.
BE, HB. SBP, Lactate levels were the most wanted indicators for recognizing of TIC. Next step, after recognizing the risk of coagulopathy is the choice of sustaining coagulation. The experts achieved the consensus on this statement but not on which was the best way to do it: Goal Directed Therapy (thromboelastography and targeted Fibrinogen replacement) or Fix Ratio supplement with PRBC FFP an PLT.
Till here the consensus.
Giuseppe Nardi, an intensivist working in Rome at Shock and Trauma Center of Azienda Ospedaliera S. Camillo Forlanini and widely recognized as one of the major experts in trauma, tried to go beyond this statement, designing a clear path for future investigations and hopefully new consensus.
Steady underlining the subjective value of the data, he identified a potential cut-off value for each of the most important indicators of early coagulopathy in trauma.
He indicated:
-
BE -6
-
SBP ↓100 mmHg
-
HB ↓10 mg/dl
-
Lactate ↑ 5 mmol/L
Said that just one of this values is predictive of fibrinogen depletion (normal plasma fibrinogen levels range from 200 to 450 mg/dl, and current guidelines recommend maintaining the plasma fibrinogen level above 150 m g/dl) and on the base of those values he hypothesized that, with a good approximation, clinicians can identify the risk of trauma induced coagulopathy.
Nardi based his assumption on some good articles present in letterature, but he mentioned one in particular:
Estimation of plasma fibrinogen levels based on hemoglobin, base excess and Injury Severity Score upon emergency room admission.
This is a retrospective study of major trauma patients (ISS ≥16) with documented plasma fibrinogen analysis upon ER admission. Plasma fibrinogen was correlated with Hb, BE and ISS, alone and in combination.
The study, being retrospective, is at risk of confounding bias even if regression analysis was conducted.
The authors concluded:”Upon ER admission, FIB of major trauma patients shows strong correlation with rapidly obtainable, routine laboratory parameters such as Hb and BE. These two parameters might provide an insightful and rapid tool to identify major trauma patients at risk of acquired hypofibrinogenemia. Early calculation of ISS could further increase the ability to predict FIB in these patients. We propose that FIB can be estimated during the initial phase of trauma care based on bedside tests.”
Nardi, together with Osvaldo Chiara, Giovanni Gordini and other well known experts in trauma, is part of the Trauma Update Network (TUN) and elaborated the Early Coagulopathy Support (ECS) protocol:
“The protocol aims to avoid the use of plasma in the patients who will need a limited number of PRBCs, reduce the plasma related complications, and improve coagulation support in patients requiring massive transfusion through the early restoration of fibrinogen blood concentration. The ECS protocol has been developed assuming to have a point of care monitoring of coagulation, but can also be applied if a viscoelastic monitoring is not available. The ECS will be adopted by the TUN trauma centers with strict monitoring of economic impact and clinical results” (from: Giuseppe Nardi, Vanessa Agostini, Beatrice Rondinelli Maria et al. Prevention and treatment of trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC). An intended protocol from the Italian trauma update research group)
The basic principles of ECS can be so summarized:
- All hemorrhagic patients (or bleeding risk) should receive early anti–fibrinolytic therapy (within the first 3 hours of injury)
- The severity of hypoperfusion and the risk of coagulopathy correlate with the levels of Lactate and BE and pH as well as with the values of PA and Hb.
- In case of bleeding fibrinogen is the most critical factor in the coagulation process and should be early replaced
- The remaining coagulation factors are significantly decreased only later, and only in response to massive hemorrhage
- Platelets decreased significantly only after massive hemorrhage but their functionality may be significantly limited by hypothermia
- The control and correction of hypothermia is essential
- Fluid challenge can be granted using crystalloids in patients with bleeding who do not requires massive transfusion (≤6 PRBC within 24 hours)
- Transfusions of plasma and PTL to patients who do not have a massive hemorrhage should be avoided
- In case of massive bleeding, it is desirable to transfuse plasma early in relation Plasma / PRBC in 1: 2 or 1: 1 ratio.
- It is not necessary to start the transfusion of platelets it immediately after the admission of the patient (except in cases of anti-aggregation therapy)
- Coagulation monitoring should be guaranted by viscoelastic methods (ROTEM / TEG); in the absence of these tools coagulation parameters (INR, PTT) over a, fibrinogen and platelets, must be monitored at close intervals.
But how those assumption can be related to practical clinical world?
The identification of parameters and cut-off values to recognize TIC can be a great step forward on the choice of the right patients in whom starting an early hemostatic resuscitation, avoiding both the risk of exposure to unneeded side effects than the possibility of wasting precious clinical resources.
The achievement of target level of plasmatic fibrinogen (with Fresh Frozen Plasma in fix ratio or with the goal directed administration of concentrated Fibrinogen ) can be the next level for treating trauma patients.
References:
- Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy Karim Brohi, BSc, FRCS, FRCA, Jasmin Singh, MB, BS, BSc, Mischa Heron, MRCP, FFAEM, and Timothy Coats, MD, FRCS, FFAEM
- The Coagulopathy of Trauma A Review of Mechanism John R. Hess, MD, MPH, FACP, FAAAS, Karim Brohi, MD, Richard P. Dutton, MD, MBA, Carl J. Hauser, MD, FACS, FCCM, John B. Holcomb, MD, FACS, Yoram Kluger, MD, Kevin Mackway-Jones, MD, FRCP, FRCS, FCEM, Michael J. Parr, MB, BS, FRCP, FRCA, FANZCA, FJFICM, Sandro B. Rizoli, MD, PhD, FRCSC, Tetsuo Yukioka, MD, David B. Hoyt, MD, FACS, and Bertil Bouillon, MD
- Role of fibrinogen in trauma-induced coagulopathy D. Fries, W. Z. Martini
- Early coagulopathy at hospital admission predicts initial or delayed fibrinogen deficit in severe trauma patients Deras, Pauline MD; Villiet, Maxime PharmD; Manzanera, Jonathan MD; Latry, Pascal MD; Schved, Jean-François MD, PhD; Capdevila, Xavier MD, PhD; Charbit, Jonathan MD
- Frequency, risk stratification and therapeutic management of acute post-traumatic coagulopathy M. Maegele
- Prevention and treatment of trauma induced coagulopathy (TIC). An intended protocol from the Italian trauma update research group. Giuseppe Nardi, Vanessa Agostini, Beatrice Rondinelli, Maria Grazia Bocci, Stefano Di Bartolome Giovanni Bini, Osvaldo Chiara, Emiliano Cingolani, Elvio De Blasio, Giovanni Gordini, Carlo Coniglio, Concetta Pellegrini, Luigi Targa and Annalisa Volpi

Mi piace:
Mi piace Caricamento...
Tag:coagulopathy, major trauma, trauma, trauma induced coagulopathy
Open Chest Wounds. The Prehospital Management
3 AgoThe current guidelines indicates commercial chest seals both vent or non vent as a valid option to treat open chest wounds. In any case if a commercial chest seal is not available the 3 sided closed dressing is no longer recommended and a total occlusive medication is the current indication.
Commercial chest seal VS improvised 3 sided chest dressing
A chest dressing closed on 3 sides was the traditional option of treatment. They are often difficult to adhere, ineffective and difficult to improvise in time-critical scenarios. New and recent guidelines recommended an occlusive medication with strict surveillance and in case of signs of tension pneumothorax the dressing must be removed. If the patients does not improve after removing the seal open thoracostomy is indicated.
BET 3: In a penetrating chest wound is a three-sided dressing or a one-way chest seal better at preventing respiratory complications?
Major trauma: assessment and initial management. 1.3 Management of chest trauma in pre‑hospital settings
Vent vs Non Vent Chest Seal
A vent commercial chest seal is the first line option in prehospital setting.
Vented versus unvented chest seals for treatment of pneumothorax and prevention of tension pneumothorax in a swine model
Treatment of Thoracic Trauma: Lessons From the Battlefield Adapted to All Austere Environments
In case vent chest seal is not available use non vent chest seal and if the patients develops hypotension, hypoxia, respiratory distress, remove the seal or performa an open thoracostomy.
So what to do?
First get an airway and put the lung on positive pressure ventilation (Volume or Pressure Targeted Ventilation) :
Positive pressure in the chest during the entire respiratory cycle and avoiding negative pressure during inspiration decreases the risk of tension pneumothorax
If you have the patient on a spinal board with a cervical collar the larynx is narrowed and when the patient is in spontaneous breathing the air preferentially enters from the chest wound. Placing an OT and positive pressure ventilation avoids this mechanism and prevents tension in the thorax.
Positive pressure ventilation re-inflates the collapsed lung and improve oxygenation (PEEP) and ventilation (Minute Ventilation).
Second close the wound with
Vent chest seal as first option
Non vent chest seal if vent is not available
Non commercial chest dressing closed on 3 sides is your last resort
Condividi:
Mi piace:
Tag:emergency medicine, emergenza sanitaria territoriale, major trauma, medicina d'urgenza, medicina d'urgenza preospedaliera, pneumothorax, pneumotorace, prehospital emergency medicine, trauma, trauma toracico