Evidenced Based Medicine (EBM): Beyond the dogma

16 Nov evidence-based-medicine-word-collage-concept-vector-illustration-42380553 copy

A disclosure on reading EBM based guidelines (and interpreting statistical analysis)evidence-based-medicine-word-collage-concept-vector-illustration-42380553 copy

Before presenting my comments on 2015 ALS Guidelines I wanna share my thoughts on EBM based guidelines and interpretation of statistical analysis as a “disclosure” for all MEDEST followers and to clarify some concepts on this two methodological approach.

Evidence Based Medicine External Validation and applicability.

EBM is based on RCTs (randomized and controlled) studies as maximum expression of quality of evidences.

The original spirit of EBM was to improve the quality of care for real patients in the real world (external validation). RCT studies are mostly based on controlled group of patients and regional organizations, expressions of local contexts and not always applicable to a more wide population of patients.

So in the years the concern about GRADE score of evidence (where RCTs trials are the highest expressions of evidence), made EBM based guidelines more focused on internal validation than external validation and applicability in widest clinical contexts.

Everyone of us when comes to clinical practice have to consider this potential bias.

Local context, individual clinical experience and local experts opinion can be the bridge between internal and external validation of RCT studies and EBM based guidelines.

Statistical Analysis

Similar considerations can be done on statistical analysis and statistical significative results.

To better explain this concept consider the result of this trial, Therapeutic Hypothermia after Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Childrenrecently published in NEJM.

Results: The proportion of survivors with VABS-II scores of 70 or more at 12 months was not significantly different between the two groups (20% in the hypothermia group vs. 12% in the normothermia group; relative likelihood, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86 to 2.76; P=0.14)

Authors conclusions: In conclusion, in comatose children who survive of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, therapeutic hypothermia, as compared with therapeutic normothermia, did not confer a significant benefit with respect to survival with good functional outcome at 1 year. Survival at 12 months did not differ significantly between the treatment groups.

The authors conclusions are based on a P value of 0,14 that effectively is not relevant froma a statistical point of view. But what about ethic and clinical side of the picture? Can we ignore such a numerical difference on the base of a statistical interpretation?

In an other article (see in the references Difficulty interpreting the results of some trials: the case of therapeutic hypothermia after pediatric cardiac arrest.)  is well illustrated this dilemma, simulating a conversation between a physician and a parent of a post cardiac arrest comatose child.

From the article:

Doctor: I’m really sorry, but your child may have serious brain damage as a result of his cardiac arrest.

Parent: That’s terrible! Isn’t there anything we can do?

Doctor: I’m afraid not. There are some interventions that have been suggested, but they’ve not been shown to be effective.

Parent: What interventions?

Doctor: Well, cooling the body for a couple of days, for example. It’s been tried in neonates with birth asphyxia and adults after cardiac arrest.

Parent: But … if this intervention is used in neonates and adults, how can you say it won’t work in children?

Doctor: Well, in a recent study including almost 300 children, 20 % of those who were cooled survived with good brain function versus just 12 % of those who weren’t cooled. Neurological status improved in 38 % of the cooled children compared with only 29 % of the non-cooled. And, 28 days after the arrest, the mortality rate was 10 % lower in cooled children (57 % versus 67 %). Unfortunately, when the researchers applied the standard statistical rules that we use to interpret all scientific research, there was more than a 10 % possibility that these differences were due to chance, so we can’t recommend it.

Parent: But those results are really encouraging. Even if statistics tell you that this may be due to chance, there’s still the possibility that it wasn’t and I’d like my child to have that opportunity. Maybe the treatment’s expensive?

Doctor: No, that’s not the issue.

Parent: Was it dangerous then?

Doctor: Quite safe actually. Potassium and platelet levels went down a little, but with no harmful consequences. There is a risk that the heart rhythm can be affected; some of these abnormalities can even be quite dangerous. In the same study, serious abnormalities of the heart rhythm occurred in 11 % of the cooled children and 9 % of the others. Reduction in body temperature also increases the risk of infections; the investigators of this study reported that 46 % of cooled children developed an infection, compared with 39 % of the other children.

Parent: So, the treatment is associated with some risk but can still improve the chances of my child surviving… how can you balance the benefits and the risks for my boy?

Doctor: Honestly, I don’t know. If I just have to use numbers… 12 children would need to be cooled instead of kept at normal temperature in order to have one additional child with a good clinical outcome. And, 15 children would need to be cooled for one child to develop an infection.

Parent: Please, try this treatment on my child.

Statistical analysis is not the only determinant in daily clinical practice such as in real life. Reading the results of clinical trials beyond statistical analysis is important when we arrive to apply those results in our clinical practice.

Again, clinical gestalt and local experiences has to be considered when interpreting statistical analysis of clinical trials.



Management of life threatening asthma in the emergency department

10 Nov

An approach to the initial management of the asthma patient presenting to the emergency department in extremis

Source: Management of life threatening asthma in the emergency department

Prehospital Ketamine by Andrew Schmidt

22 Oct

Video post by @andrewjtagg.

Source: Prehospital Ketamine by Andrew Schmidt

The Day?

17 Oct


15 Oct 2015. The Guidelines day?


Fluids and Kids: What Now?

15 Oct


The only controlled trial of fluid resuscitation, Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST), involving 3141 African children with severe febrile illness, including large groups with sepsis and malaria, called into question aggressive fluid resuscitation, demonstrating excess mortality in both bolus arms (albumin and saline) compared to no-bolus control, relative risk of morality in bolus versus control was 1.45 (1.13-1.86, p=0.003)
Four years have elapsed since the publication of FEAST, yet World Health Organization continues to recommend fluid boluses for children managed in resource-poor hospitals, where there is no access to intensive care. In Africa alone, where one in 10 febrile child admissions present with shock, we have estimated that the current guidelines, if fully implemented, will result in ~5,600 and 33,000 excess deaths each year per million hospital admissions treated for shock.

Originally posted on Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine - THE PHARM dedicated to the memory of Dr John Hinds:

Kath Maitland, the author of the FEAST study, talks about where we go now with fluids in kids, following FEAST

Source: Fluids and Kids: What Now?

View original

Clinical Tips in Prehospital Emergency Medicine 

12 Oct

Quick tutorial video on simple clinical questions in prehospital emergency medicine


Clinical Tips in Prehospital Emergency Medicine 

26 Sep Multi-Ethnic Group Of People's Arms Raised Holding Letters That Form Tips

Quick tutorial video on simple clinical questions in prehospital emergency medicine


Forget ALS Guidelines when dealing with PEA. Part 2.


If you were interested in Forget ACLS Guidelines when dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity Part 1 here is the Part 2 of the presentation.

In Part 1 we discussed about diagnosis and diagnostic tools. Here are suggested alternative way to evaluate and treat patients with PEA.

MEDEST you tubeAs usual all your comments will be welcome.

Is this the sub $100 Videolaryngoscope ? Has HolyGrail been found?

15 Sep

Originally posted on Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine - THE PHARM dedicated to the memory of Dr John Hinds:


View original

Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1.

ACLS Guidelines are misleading about diagnosis and treatment of pulseless electric activity (PEA)
This takes to conceptual and clinical errors when treating patients in cardiac arrest.
Let’s see why and if there is a better way to follow when dealing with this kind of patients.
First part is about diagnosis and diagnostic tools.

Live your comment below and see you soon for Part 2. The treatment options.





When minutes matter...

Songs or Stories

Sharing the Science and Art of Paediatric Anaesthesia


"Live as if you will die tomorrow; Learn as if you will live forever"


Navigating resuscitation

ems pocus

Taking the hocus out of pocus and bringing hospital care to the streets.

LITFL: Life in the Fast Lane Medical Blog

Emergency medicine and critical care medical education blog


Emergency Medicine Education

The Collective

A Hive Mind for Prehospital and Retrieval Med

Dave on Airways

Thoughts and opinions on airways and resuscitation science


Why FOAM it alone?

Broome Docs

Rural Generalist Doctors Education


Meducation in Virchester #FOAMed


Bringing the Boring to EM

"CardioOnline"Basic and Advanced Cardiovascular medicine" Cariology" concepts and Review -Dr.Nabil Paktin,MD.FACC.دکتـور نبــــیل "پاکطــــین

این سایت را به آن دکتوران و محصلین طب که شب و روز برای رفاه نوع انسان فداکاری می کنند ، جوانی و لذایذ زندگی را بدون چشمداشت به امتیاز و نفرین و آفرین قربان خدمت به بشر می کنند و بار سنگین خدمت و اصلاح را بدوش می کشند ، اهداء می کنم This site is dedicated to all Doctors and students that aver the great responsibility of People’s well-being upon their shoulders and carry on their onerous task with utmost dedication and Devotionاولین سایت و ژورنال انتــرنتی علـــمی ،تخـصصی ، پــژوهشــی و آمــوزشــی طبـــی در افغــانســـتان


Free Open Access Medical Education

Little Medic

Learning everything I can from everywhere I can. This is my little blog to keep track of new things medical, paramedical and pre-hospital from a student's perspective.

Prehospital Emergency Medicine Blog

All you want to know about prehospital emergency medicine


The FOAM Search Engine

EM Lyceum

where everything is up for debate . . .

Pediatric EM Morsels

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Education

EM Pills

curiosità-novità-aggiornamenti in medicina d'urgenza


Free Open Access Medical Education for Paramedics


Free Open Access Meducation 4 General Practice

Rural Doctors Net

useful resources for rural clinicians

Auckland HEMS

Unofficial site for prehospital care providers of the Auckland HEMS service




Prehospital Emergency Medicine


Just another WordPress.com site

EM Basic

Your Boot Camp Guide to Emergency Medicine

KI Doc


Emergency Live

Prehospital Emergency Medicine


Academic Medicine Pearls in Emergency Medicine from THE Ohio State University Residency Program

ERCAST Emergency Medicine Podcasts

Emergency medicine, podcasts, reviews, opinion and curbside consults

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

 Academic Life in Emergency Medicine

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

Greater Sydney Area HEMS

The Pre-hospital & Retrieval Medicine Team of Ambulance Service NSW


Ricevi al tuo indirizzo email tutti i nuovi post del sito.

Unisciti agli altri 1.130 follower

%d blogger cliccano Mi Piace per questo: