The question about ectopy and aberrancy, even if of minor influence on theraphy that was based on clinical presentation, was interestingly debated in ECG+ community.
Prof. Ken Grauer and other members of community gave the solution on why the above 12 leads EKG was, with good approximation, referrable to a VT and not to a SVT conducted with aberrancy.
Those are the EKG criteria they individuated:
- Extreme axis “northwest axis”: (neg in lead I, positive in lead aVR);
- Lead V1 is amorphous
- Lead V6 is almost all negative
- No diphasic RS complexes in any of the precordial leads
- Monophasic R-wave in lead V1(taller left “rabbit-ear”)
- Diphasic QR complexes in leads V2 and V3.
- Monophasic QS complexes in leads V4, V5, and V6.
- Josephson’s sign (notching on the nadir of S wave)
Those criteria, even if present in this case, are universally valid.
If you want to discover more on this topic MEDEST already posted on this topic in a previous post
There you can find alle the references on EKG criteria for differential diagnosis between ectopy and aberrancy in wide comples tachycardia.
The “3 SIMPLE Rules”: an easy and accurate tool for recognizing VT
17 DicRule #1 Is there extreme axis deviation during WCT
Rule #2 Is lead V6 all (or almost all) negative?
Rule #3 Is the QRS during WCT “ugly”?
Condividi:
Mi piace:
Tag:aberrancy, arrhythmias, ectopy, EKG, VT