Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1.

5 Sep
ACLS Guidelines are misleading about diagnosis and treatment of pulseless electric activity (PEA)
This takes to conceptual and clinical errors when treating patients in cardiac arrest.
Let’s see why and if there is a better way to follow when dealing with this kind of patients.
First part is about diagnosis and diagnostic tools.

Live your comment below and see you soon for Part 2. The treatment options.

Logo MEDEST2

4 Responses to “Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1.”

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1. | Prehospital and Retrieval Medicine - THE PHARM dedicated to the memory of Dr John Hinds - 5 September 2015

    […] http://medest118.com/2015/09/05/forget-acls-guidelines-if-you-are-dealing-with-pulseless-electric-ac… […]

  2. Prehospital POCUS: Why I love it! Real Clinical Scenario. | MEDEST - 10 July 2017

    […] Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1. […]

  3. 2015 ALS Guidelines update. What really changes in our daily practice. - 2 March 2022

    […] similar entity and have a common algorithm. This is wrong, and we already treated this topic (Forget ACLS guidelines if you are dealing with Pulseless Electric Activity. Part 1. Forget ALS Guidelines when dealing with PEA. Part 2.). 2015 Guidelines reiterated this […]

  4. How a perfect ALS can kill (part 2) | Emergency Live - 25 March 2022

    […] Part 1 we discussed about diagnosis and diagnostic tools. Here are suggested alternative way to evaluate […]

Leave a Reply

Discover more from MEDEST

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading