Leave a ReplyCancel reply
Follow MEDEST via Email/Segui MEDEST via Email
Join 403 other subscribers
Recent Posts
- When “no difference” isn’t the same as “doesn’t work”: reading REBOARREST trial carefully 12 July 2026
- Defibrillation Strategies: Why AHA’s position on VC and DSED is Controversial 1 February 2026
- Safer Ventilation Strategies 28 July 2025
- Is This The End? 28 June 2024
- Chest compressions in Traumatic CIRCULATORY Arrest 16 June 2024
- Time to trash proximal tibia and 15 mm IO needle in adult & paediatric cardiac arrest! 14 May 2024
- Confirming Tracheal Intubation: stop wasting your time! 2 July 2023
The MEDEST on line News
Paperli.PaperWidget.Show({pid: '71aba46f-dee1-4148-93c6-c1537be7ba8a', width: 200, background: '#FB0000'})
Archives
Scrivi a MEDEST
Le tue opinioni sono il nostro valore aggiunto!
Fluids and Kids: What Now?
15 OctThe only controlled trial of fluid resuscitation, Fluid Expansion as Supportive Therapy (FEAST), involving 3141 African children with severe febrile illness, including large groups with sepsis and malaria, called into question aggressive fluid resuscitation, demonstrating excess mortality in both bolus arms (albumin and saline) compared to no-bolus control, relative risk of morality in bolus versus control was 1.45 (1.13-1.86, p=0.003)
Four years have elapsed since the publication of FEAST, yet World Health Organization continues to recommend fluid boluses for children managed in resource-poor hospitals, where there is no access to intensive care. In Africa alone, where one in 10 febrile child admissions present with shock, we have estimated that the current guidelines, if fully implemented, will result in ~5,600 and 33,000 excess deaths each year per million hospital admissions treated for shock.
Share this:
Like this:
Related