Leave a ReplyCancel reply
Follow MEDEST via Email/Segui MEDEST via Email
Join 372 other subscribers
Recent Posts
- Right Here, Right Now! A Situational Awareness Framework for Invasive Procedures in Prehospital Care 10 September 2026
- When “no difference” isn’t the same as “doesn’t work”: reading REBOARREST trial carefully 12 July 2026
- Defibrillation Strategies: Why AHA’s position on VC and DSED is Controversial 1 February 2026
- Safer Ventilation Strategies 28 July 2025
- Is This The End? 28 June 2024
- Chest compressions in Traumatic CIRCULATORY Arrest 16 June 2024
- Time to trash proximal tibia and 15 mm IO needle in adult & paediatric cardiac arrest! 14 May 2024
The MEDEST on line News
Paperli.PaperWidget.Show({pid: '71aba46f-dee1-4148-93c6-c1537be7ba8a', width: 200, background: '#FB0000'})
Archives
Scrivi a MEDEST
Le tue opinioni sono il nostro valore aggiunto!
Still not time! But we’re moving forward!
12 JunWe launched several days ago the pool about which was the first choice when dealing with airways in a critical hill patient. Provocatively the pool was introduced by an announcement about the death of Direct Laringoscopy and the rising of Video Laryngoscopy as first choice.
Here are the results!
So it’s stil not time? Yes, but we are moving toward an era where videolaryngoscopy will be the first choice.
Almost one third of the providers are already choosing video as the first choice in environments, prehospital, ER an critical care where this technology is still not widely available and where the classical airway management teaching is still dominated by direct laringoscopy.
My personale thought is that direct laryngoscopy has to be part of the cultural and technical baggage of an emergency provider and has to be part of teaching courses but just as prelude to a clinical practice environment where technology and well trained professionals permit to use the best available device.
Share this:
Like this:
Related