New 2015 ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke downgrade tPA within first 3 hours to a Level B recommendation (and other condsiderations about this policy).

24 Lug

On June 2015 ACEP updated the 2013 policy on ischemic stroke treatment.

The 2013 policy graded the tPA administration within 3 hours as a Level A recommendation and tPA administration between 3 to 4.5 hours as Level B recommendation

2013 Stroke tPA

2013 ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke

In Jan 2015 ACEP published a Draft about the update of the 2013 clinical policy based on 2 critical questions:

  1. Is IV tPA safe and effective for patients with acute ischemic stroke if given within 3 hours of symptom onset?
  2. Is IV tPA safe and effective for patients with acute ischemic stroke treated between 3 to 4.5 hours after symptom onset?
2015 Draft

January 2015 Draft about ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke

2015 draft 2

January 2015 Draft about ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke

In June 2015 the definitive policy was released, based on the same critical questions. 

2015 stroke tpa

2015 ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke

2015 def 2

2015 ACEP Clinical policy on ischemic stroke

Here is the most relevant changes:

  • TPA administration within 3 hours was graded as a Level B recommendation (NNT 8 with a 95% CI).
  • The statement says that tPA should be offered and may be given to selected patients” (“should be offered” alone in 2013 policy)
  • In the same Level B recommendation was incorporated consideration (that in the previously Jan Draft was Level A) about sICH risk (7% with a NNH of 17 and 95%CI).
  • TPA administration between 3 and 4.5 hours is still considered a Level B recommendation (NNT=14; 95% CI). The the risk of early sICH in this case correspond to a NNH of 23 (95% CI)
  • The recommendation statement begins mentioning and prioritizing the “known risk of sICH and the variability in the degree of benefit in functional outcomes”, and about tPA treatment says “may be given to carefully selected patients” (“should be considered” in in 2013 policy)

Some considerations on evidences supporting the recommendations in this 2015 policy:

  • TPA administration within 3 hours is supported by just 1 Class I study (NINDS part 2, 1995), a small study (n.333 ) that despite the benefit on functional outcomes, demonstrate no statistically significant difference in 3-month mortality, and was never been replicated. 
  • All the sub-analysis from NINDS study where considered of Class II or III evidences.
  • ECASS III study was downgraded (from 2013 policy) to a Class II evidence study cause of “baseline differences between groups and changes in the timing of tPA administration during the course of the study”.
  • IST-3 study is graded as a Class III study.
  • TPA Administration between 3 and 4.5 hours is supported just by 1 Class II study and some other Class III case series.

What I like about the policy:

  • Level B recommendation for tPA administration within 3 hours is fair enough
  • The panel who examined the available litterature put the right light on controversies and conflict of interest involved in most of the recent studies (ATLANTIS, IST-3, ECASS ecc…) and following statistical analysis,  grading most of them as Class III evidences, and leaving as Class I just NINDS part 2 (a 1995 study who yes demonstrate benefit on functional outcome but no difference in 3 months mortality, is a small study and has never been reproduced) .

What I don’t like about the policy:

  • Level B recommendation for tPA administration between 3 and 4.5 hours is too high cause is supported just by 1 Class II study (ECASS III) and a bunch of Class III evidences.
  • The authors in their final statement play with terms jumping between “should be offered and may be given” and “selected patients” for 3 hours treatment to “may be given” and “carefully selected patients”for the 3 to 4.5 hours treatment, to emphasize the difference between recommendations both graded as Level B but supported by such a different quality of evidences. These leave to clinician a wide margin of discretionality (“may be given” but also “may be not”) supporting them in their choices (whatever it is, and that is good), but from the other hand not giving a clear advice or any clinical tool to help the decision making process. This gonna result in a large variability of approach.
  • The risk of sICH is the only demonstrated and consistent evidence that appears trough the letterature in those years and is not clear why in the draft of Jan 2015 was classified as Level A and in the definitive policy was relegated as Level B with no new evidences added in the meantime, and no clear explaination.

Bottom line

I think thrombolysis is a beneficial treatment for a selected group of patients. The available evidences and policies (even this last one) based on time window alone, and not patient centered, don’t clearly indicate which group of patients really benefits from tPA administration.

This 2015 ACEP policy suggests physician to strongly consider the risk (evident)/benefit (maybe) ratio when offering tPA in acute ischemic stroke and to strongly involve patients in the final decision. It also leave the clinician a wide range of choice to decide which is the right patient to treat with tPA.

“When considering administration of IV tPA for a patient with acute ischemic stroke within 3 hours of stroke symptom onset, the physician and patient (and/or the surrogate) should weigh the potential benefit in terms of long-term functional outcome against the increased risk of sICH while recognizing that IV tPA does not alter 90-day mortality.

Important readings:

Evidence class

Litterature classification schema of Evidence Class

Recomm class

Recommendation Level Classification

References:

Unmissible resources:

Logo MEDEST2

Rispondi

Inserisci i tuoi dati qui sotto o clicca su un'icona per effettuare l'accesso:

Logo WordPress.com

Stai commentando usando il tuo account WordPress.com. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto Twitter

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Twitter. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Foto di Facebook

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Facebook. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Google+ photo

Stai commentando usando il tuo account Google+. Chiudi sessione / Modifica )

Connessione a %s...

thinking critical care

a blog for thinking docs: blending good evidence, physiology, common sense, and applying it at the bedside!

urgentcareultrasound

More definitive diagnosis, better patient care

My CPD

For WMAS clinicians

Critical Care Northampton

Reviewing Critical Care, Journals and FOAMed

OHCA research

Prehospital critical care for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

SonoStuff

Education and entertainment for the ultrasound enthusiast

phemcast

A UK PREHOSPITAL PODCAST

First10EM

Emergency medicine resuscitation - When minutes matter...

Songs or Stories

Sharing the Science and Art of Paediatric Anaesthesia

airwayNautics

"Live as if you will die tomorrow; Learn as if you will live forever"

resusNautics

Navigating resuscitation

EMSPOCUS

Taking the hocus out of pocus and bringing hospital care to the streets.

LITFL • Life in the Fast Lane Medical Blog

Emergency medicine and critical care medical education blog

emDOCs.net - Emergency Medicine Education

Our goal is to inform the global EM community with timely and high yield content about what providers like YOU are seeing and doing everyday in your local ED.

The Collective

A Hive Mind for Prehospital and Retrieval Med

Dave on Airways

Thoughts and opinions on airways and resuscitation science

FOAMcast

A Free Open Access Medical Education Emergency Medicine Core Content Mash Up

Broome Docs

Rural Generalist Doctors Education

St.Emlyn's

Emergency Medicine #FOAMed

BoringEM

Bringing the Boring to EM

"CardioOnline"Basic and Advanced Cardiovascular medicine" Cariology" concepts and Review -Dr.Nabil Paktin,MD.FACC.دکتـور نبــــیل "پاکطــــین

این سایت را به آن دکتوران و محصلین طب که شب و روز برای رفاه نوع انسان فداکاری می کنند ، جوانی و لذایذ زندگی را بدون چشمداشت به امتیاز و نفرین و آفرین قربان خدمت به بشر می کنند و بار سنگین خدمت و اصلاح را بدوش می کشند ، اهداء می کنم This site is dedicated to all Doctors and students that aver the great responsibility of People’s well-being upon their shoulders and carry on their onerous task with utmost dedication and Devotionاولین سایت و ژورنال انتــرنتی علـــمی ،تخـصصی ، پــژوهشــی و آمــوزشــی طبـــی در افغــانســـتان

EmergencyPedia

Free Open Access Medical Education

Little Medic

Learning everything I can from everywhere I can. This is my little blog to keep track of new things medical, paramedical and pre-hospital from a student's perspective.

Prehospital Emergency Medicine Blog

All you want to know about prehospital emergency medicine

Italy Customized Travel Blog

Local Travel Agent, sommelier, food & wine expert in Florence, Italy

GoogleFOAM

The FOAM Search Engine

EM Lyceum

where everything is up for debate . . .

Pediatric EM Morsels

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Education

EM Pills

curiosità-novità-aggiornamenti in medicina d'urgenza

AmboFOAM

Free Open Access Medical Education for Paramedics

FOAM4GP

Free Open Access Meducation 4 General Practice

Rural Doctors Net

useful resources for rural clinicians

Auckland HEMS

Unofficial site for prehospital care providers of the Auckland HEMS service

ECHOARTE

L'ECOGRAFIA: ENTROPIA DELL'IMMAGINE

MEDEST

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

ruralflyingdoc

Just another WordPress.com site

EM Basic

Your Boot Camp Guide to Emergency Medicine

KI Doc

WE HAVE MOVED - VISIT WWW.KIDOCS.ORG FOR NEW CONTENT

Emergency Live

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

AMP EM

Academic Medicine Pearls in Emergency Medicine from THE Ohio State University Residency Program

ERCAST Emergency Medicine Podcasts

Emergency medicine, podcasts, reviews, opinion and curbside consults

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

 Academic Life in Emergency Medicine

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

Prehospital Emergency Medicine

Greater Sydney Area HEMS

The Pre-hospital & Retrieval Medicine Team of NSW Ambulance

%d blogger hanno fatto clic su Mi Piace per questo: